Advantages Of Water Cooling

A Mapela ,
eldest daughter, this child loved too
But for what God has given me
First
Even if I was an atheist

I travel light

Silhouette dumb bells silenced my
On the pitch of an unknown land I
twists like a worm, naked
Oblivious of what I experienced too
The golds, pigs and Sometimes
strong in one body
occupants of carriages
And those cul-de-dungeon
All reveling
the first day of the year
Some of what they cram
The other for what they soufrent

My
be full of horror I first want to vomit all my heart retching
No I will not go into these designs It condemned me
wrongly
Here I finally turned away from these places abhorred
Here I foolishly thought that happiness was once nestled
As with all these women I do not like
To have the desired each other and wished I regretted

My steps are no longer counted
From my wife and children only weighted
I'm going with what I knew raise
I do not run over it with a light heart I
That is forging passes straight
As my father before me, but with faith
Mapela And if the granddaughter of Eloi's
then it my groin, new places
With God's help I made my choice
EMERY G. UHINDU-GINGALA

(Extract from Opuscule , prose and poems)

Clean White Leather Suite

EDITIONS ATTIC: An alternative route from the book THE TWELVE

E n the West, the fronts of bookstores and other shops, are crumbling under the weight of new publications . Image of the ordinary, fixed on the contemporary and does not, however, said the historic route. To the point that today is almost impossible to believe that the book has already been the exclusive domain of an intellectual elite, the prerogative of an intelligentsia which however was not only able to read and write! This little world for him had only the interest and ability to read. The "common" was quick to get on the collision of knowledge contained in these pages fly past. In truth this is the book that came to people through mass production. That is to say publishing. And money. We therefore publishing to sell. But not just anyone. This area has remained elitist for reasons that have nothing to do with profitability. That is, within the publishing community exists to date that causality, if not collusion, between the known and proven access to the publication! And where
edition suffers from being unable to develop due to lack of money, the authors are confined, even condemned to anonymity. "Here," is Africa ...
A notable exception is with the editions "Presence Africaine" Alioune Diop (1), some "old timers" are reached on the front of the Parisian literary scene, so, paradoxically, make yourself known at home. Or so some people-such as Aime Cesaire of Martinique and Senegal's Cheikh Anta Diop, ostracized by the middle of the Paris edition, the have to be known only through editions Présece Africa.
writer and poet himself, Moses Mougnan made his debut in the proximity of some of these "superstars" burkibabè historian Joseph Ki-Zerbo, the "wise" Mali's Amadou Ba Hampaté philosopher before the Lord without forgetting the mentor, Cheikh Anta Diop. All of them have blown, each in turn, the African consciousness that it now serves as a paradigm open to otherness!
Today as yesterday the implacable fact remains unchanged. African writers (whatever their chosen field) remain absent from the shelves of bookstores and libraries. The fact has a dramatic consequence on the "chain of knowledge" in Africa. Early school sometimes even at the university educated young people do not know than from a sweetened by photocopies of manuals which serve them. They learn what to say and write "other." And do not lose to know the views of Africans on critical issues of the lessons they are watered yet. Without opportunities, authors, academics, researchers in Africa do not feel encouraged to produce what is destined to remain unfulfilled. It is worse vicious circle. The impasse is such that the situation verges on the inevitable. The key, sesame should we say is the issue! Otherwise Africa is doomed to suffer alienation without the means to react.

Democratizing publishing
" The first is to stop patronizing the publishing community manifesto against the authors. They were unknown or only Africans . "Sometimes just misunderstood! The publisher Moses Mougnan Lekiangar also confesses that conclusively. Profession of faith founded the "Edit Attic" (2), this voluntarism quickly becomes challenging when the intrepid editor claims to " fusion between authors, readers and publishing . A trilogy that the confluence of interests substantive uniqueness. But then, that Moses
Mougnan is an Afro-Canadian citizen of Chad is certainly no stranger to what appears resolutely uphill battle. Yesterday as his father, Andre Mougnan federalist activist, who died in jail of dication Francois Tombalbaye. Starting from nothing, but weighted with all this baggage, and having published thirteen books, man is never returned to his charge. And never even sought any subsidy from the Government. In a country-Canada-where all the rich private organizations serving the public (radio, television, newspapers, posh private schools ...) are funded from the state budget, the approach of the founder of Éditions Grenier similar to the abnegation. " Now perhaps. Before we had to prove ourselves . The evidence is beyond what is required by the Arts Council [having already published three books] to subsidize new editors. There is also that the government grant is not intended to publish the authors elsewhere. To preserve some editorial freedom Grenier has always preferred the contributions of patrons who share its vision of publishing. And in his trial to diversity the poet-editor (3) is not afraid proud of the last author that comes to press: an eminent French teacher of Moroccan origin, Leon Ouaknine (4). The latter was designed and piloted between 2000 and 2005, with the oncologist Claude Jasmin, the University level "Quality Health" at the Faculty of Medicine at Kremlin-Bicetre, Univesrsité Paris-Sud, France. Today
mature (Grenier has published thirteen authors indiscriminately here and elsewhere who otherwise would never have been) Moses Mougnan now resolutely tackle the project close to his heart since the beginning: receive [that is to say, go for] African authors (professors, writers ...) to edit their manuscripts. Make them known at home first; then put their books in competition with the authors elsewhere. Students will then receive an invaluable source of information because African.
As if that were not enough already man embraces his "mission" head on. Kiss does too? "I do not want qu'étreindre Africa, forgotten," says the Don Quixote of publishing. So " Solidalivre " (a neologism invented by Moses Mougnan itself, and evoking solidarity with the book) is already taking shape: Rider initiative whose primary objective is to solicit books for libraries and universities in Africa, and then edit the textbooks to Africa with the lowest prices! In addition to asking authors published at Grenier to donate some of their books to Africa.
A sort of back elevator to the person who publishes, not at the author, but publisher account! If Moses
Mougnan Lekiangar manages to meet all its goals, Publishing Grenier then become the first publisher really serving schools and universities disadvantaged!
can bet it will succeed and this will be forgotten and passionate, especially in Haiti!
It will do if the man continues to believe that some cases more than others, convene a sacrifice that borders on self-sacrifice!
EMERY G. UHINDU-GINGALA

(1) Presence Africaine ( http://www.presenceafricaine.com/ ) celebrates the centenary of Alioune Diop of Senegal in various cities.
January 10, 2010 to November 14, 2010
(2) To enter the site click Attic Publishing: http://www.leseditionsgrenier.ca/
(3) Moses Mougnan N'djekornondé Lekiangar is the author of two collections of poetry "committed" to Orpheus Editions, Montreal.
(4) Leon Ouaknine just published an essay of 285 pages, "He never had subscriber number you called " Editions Grenier, September 29, 2009
The biography of the author is available on the website Publishing Grenier.

Pokemon Soul Silver Trade Emulator

The expectations for Barack Obama were so high that he could not disappoint them ... after a little less than a year in business! Unless one considers that "in the circumstances," the U.S. president is far more than we could humanly expect from someone other than himself! All citizens of the earth-elected since all the hoped-for miracles that Obama obviously could not come. And for good reason ...
EMERY G. UHINDU-GINGALA


Few people in America or elsewhere-were to question the political record of George W. Bush after his first year as president. Except of course for his Democratic opponents, so that was the role. As is conceded to a slightly retarded child, and which one expects the worst, all other turpitude President W. Bush were the lesser evil. And even at the end of his first term ordinary mortals would have failed to impute any evaluation (positive or negative) to the action of the 43rd U.S. president, as the latter was almost nonexistent. Bush distinguished himself when, in making war than al-Qaeda inspired him appropriately. Otherwise man would probably have remained an obscure dilettante which nobody would have dreamed of grant-useless-and disastrous second term.
Things are different for his successor, Barack Obama. From him the whole world, and especially everyone waiting he could settle his personal problems in the days that followed his entry into the White House.
What have we been surprised to hear young Chinese during passage of the U.S. president in their country, "it has done nothing ...." But what was he supposed to do so for them?
words, the man remains a central concern of his contemporaries throughout the world. Barack Obama continues to raise excessive expectations, disappointment for some, a profession of faith confessed by the most devout. Everywhere the man seems as though the messiah that boded nothing Only a year before he remportât presidential election! The fact, because qu'inusité contributes precisely to confer an aura almost mystical: it was this, it could just ...

Legacy
The "mission" that Barack Obama has accepted is to manage the daily, which is well understood that it can wait quietly, and correcting the errors of his predecessor. It goes without saying that the heavy legacy liabilities in the form of poisoned gift-hampers the progress of the new administration. Never mind the perverse policy of GW Bush are so at all harmful than the current president is forced to act quickly, otherwise than in precipitation.
From the earliest days of his presidency Barack Obama was faced with the bankruptcy of an economy devastated by punitive expeditions initiated by the previous administration, as well as the financial crisis in which a tradition of laissez-faire ( sacrosanct dogma emulate supposed individuality) precipitated the American banks. The new president has diligently taken steps criticized in their time as they were unpopular: to go to the rescue and institutions financial subsidizing them with billions of dollars can be seen, even in America, as a preferential treatment in respect of the wealthy! Especially since it is unwise and mercenary manipulation of these "spoiled children" that led to the mechanical gripper and lead them into the fall. And the whole world with them!
While the vigorous intervention of Barack Obama helped identify the financial crisis and save the bankrupt banks in his country. But the concomitant adverse effects had meanwhile spread like a metastasis on the "real economy". Which found itself dropped by the financial system as a too heavy load. Throughout the unemployment rate continues to peak at the same pace as job losses due to "restructuring", if not outright closures as companies asphyxiated by an unbearable debt. Again the grumbling is heard in the U.S. population. The opponents of the president have beautiful game then spread this profession in bad faith, and the newly unemployed are susceptible-the president's actions have been for nothing!

Health and ideology
Seen from afar, we remain puzzled by the cohort of protesters opposed to the U.S. draft coverage health care for all! The average American, even those who pay exorbitant prices for her medical insurance does not cover these "socialistic tendencies," when it comes to health, yet no one condemns the state subsidizes tower arm rich farmers agricultural aviation companies, and today the big banks and carmakers. This paradox is not yet an enigma: In their relentless quest for lower heroic figure, and that it is a high-flying crook does not change anything, Americans feel toward an end to rich- achieve, "American Dream" requires-an indulgence that is also prepared to poor! Thus the free-and those who claim benefit, attracting suspicion. The wealthy, they are Bill Gates and Bernard Madoff, serve as models. While the payroll of the "tax payers" borders on infamy! Because these are practices that fall of communism and even fascism, willingly confess those watching knew little epithets. Adolph Hitler and Stalin to Obama, shortcuts have been widely borrowed without it really did not know why. But then Barack Obama
inherited of virtually all of everything that today dispute the United States. Well, and we could forget, the thorny issue of health insurance is provided courtesy of the Clinton administration. No Bill, but his wife Hillary, now secretary of state to Obama. She was once charged by her president husband was told also that she appropriated it again-proposing the project in both houses of the famous attempt of a smoker and health insurance extends to all Americans . With the result that we know. Hillary Clinton is
imposed to Obama that the project was a priority in his first term. Negotiating the peace, she demanded to advance the acceptance of new functions that were proposed. With the result that we do not know yet ...
We only know that the U.S. president is determined to complete this trial. And though it claimed and then some, in truth, no doubt he will succeed. Although after significant concessions to opponents who really have no choice but to endorse the president's wishes!

"Pax Obama" Barack
Accession Obama in the White House has had the effect of releasing some tension between America and the world. It is true that the war policy and Manichean-of-its predecessor had considerably "poisoned" international relations. And even if the world, far from it, do not always know peace, a certain calm presides implications once entrenched camps! Now therefore 'Stretched' U.S. President to Muslims worldwide, especially in Iran, some saw it as weakness, while for others it was acting in a gesture of Opening loaded with symbolism. Especially in these troubled times when Satan is one, and "the great devil" the other!
With a president who treats all his counterparts in equal-and equal-arrogance does not seem to be the other name of the United States. After less than a year in power Obama has managed the feat of humanizing the image of "Uncle George" the other George the "W" - had helped to demonize. Is it coincidence that the U.S. president is more popular than all its ... equal in their respective countries? Except perhaps (and paradoxically) in Israel, "the friend and ally" of Israel forever ... And
precisely: the legislative election that brought Benjamin Netanyahu to power had the perverse effect of attracting the entire political class to the right. During the campaign all candidates happily surfing the wave carrying the "all safe". In the bidding, which was to embody the best posture is the most aggressive and most cruel to the Palestinians. Especially those in Gaza guilty of allegiance to the government, however democratically elected Hamas!
result, Israel is left over. All barred "all right! "Political calculation. But by conviction. For, conversely, Tel Aviv can not claim membership in peace with the Palestinians and the outside world. Now therefore fear of disappointing the inner-and thus lose the election-is stronger than the image we present on the international level. As all observers of international politics had to be seen, there is currently no leader in Israel in scope: a strong personality and able to risk the challenge of peace without fear of a negative vote of the people! Like Yitzhak Rabin and Ariel Sharon even, perhaps sensing his approaching end, had turned into a follower imperturbable peace with the Palestinians. Kadima, the new center-left party that began on foot was designed to thwart acquaintances that the "Labor", to which he belonged, marched with the right. After the "case" Helmud Olmer, Kadima is now headed by Tzipi Livni, a muse and power-hungry ... Palestinian blood! Golda Meir in a sum, but without the excuse of a previously uncertain context, Israel is currently a State and heavily armed with nuclear weapons. Moreover, the most powerful army in the world-the United States-is an unconditional ally of Israel. Faced with the Palestinians who lack even a single battle tank!
Now therefore the other side of the "Wall": Palestinians into two entities that occur in lapdog. Hamas violently indignant that his victory gained democratically through the ballot was disqualified by the quasi-totality of the international community ... As for Fatah's leader and President of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, for s' be registered to fake his now "enemy brother" Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas, appears as the natural ally of Israel! Abbas offers today the disastrous image of the "traitor to the common cause!
The Palestinian president is not far from it, Yasser Arafat. "Abu Amar" had known, and one after him, the different Palestinian factions crystallized around the only issue that mattered most: the resistance to "the occupier and oppressor" of Israel!
one side or the other of the separation wall we find the same archetype of leadership: politicians! Each other and are inhabited by the lust for power. For the sake of exercise. And that President Mahmoud Abbas asserted that there is more give admission of failure. The theatricality of his scandal part of a strategy, a kind of blackmail-not-outrageous still on the international community to Tel Aviv forced to stop his trial from wild colonization of Palestinian territories. Now therefore the current state of things (Israel no longer has long been the target of terrorist attacks on its territory) only the Palestinians have an interest in the peace process be revived. Thus Binyamin Netanyahu is doing everything he can to be spoken without peace than ever we succeeded. By building new settlements stand it draws so many obstacles to the resumption of the "roadmap". The president of the Palestinian Authority, was also weakens it, which may not be tantamount to political suicide-yield on Chapter of settlements.
With friends like the U.S. president does not need enemies!
Abbas and Netanyahu are clearly not valid interlocutors for Barack Obama in seeking a just peace in the Middle East. Even fewer partners.

The Nobel controversy
It is undeniable that Barack Obama enjoys a reputation as huge and internationally. This popularity has its opposite: a neurotic suspicion. Since expects everything from him, we do not concede him the least "that can not be anything less! "Says the adage.
So all recipients of the Nobel peace that President Bush would be the least deserving. Worse, they whisper aloud that the awarding of this recognition is "a political maneuver." Now, therefore, all Nobel, the peace prize is a highly political! And it is not enough to have established-for-peace be awarded the prestigious award. They are even rare ones, like Nelson Mandela, who received the Nobel Peace after having done it! Just look: we can reasonably say that Yasser Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin have never succeeded peace between Palestinians and Israelis. What significance should we then grant the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to them in 1994? And before them (1978) Egyptian Anwar el-Sadat and Israel's Menachem Begin. Burma has not changed under the action activist Aung San Suu Kyi, however it is to share the greatest Nobel Peace Prize in 1991. The following year the Guatemalan activist for indigenous rights, Rigoberta Menchú, wins the prestigious prize for his fight for his people-the Indians-without the position of the latter has since been significantly improved. Neither the late South Korean President Kim Dae-Jung (Nobel 2000), neither the Iranian lawyer Shirin Ebadi (2003) have changed the course of events in their respective countries. And the list goes on.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee to sacrifice peace of course certain criteria to reward " personality with [during the previous year] the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, the abolition or reduction standing armies, at the meeting and the spread of progress for peace . Since the statement does not mention the preposition " and " but the conjunction "or ", we understand that it must have been one thing or another ... So for
Obama's detractors, since all like to see win the prize, the American president would enter not already in either of the categories!
Obviously, having faith does not forbid that one is in bad faith!
EMERY G. UHINDU-GINGALA